pijul_org / pijul

#47 Add a way to manually declare patch dependencies while recording

Opened by lthms, on April 11, 2017
Closed
pijul-0.8
lthms commented on April 11, 2017

That way, it would be possible to add semantic dependencies (e.g., this patch relies on the feature introduced by this other patch, even if they do not have any line change in common).

FlorentBecker commented on April 12, 2017

darcs has this, and it is a nice thing to have. Yet it is not clear if we want this semantic dependencies to be treated like actual dependencies, or just be metadata that the user can opt to ignore.

lthms commented on April 12, 2017

I do not have any strong opinion about this, to be honest. The latter seems more flexible of course and that can be a strong advantage.

lthms commented on September 3, 2017

This is, I think, the last feature I really miss.

lthms commented on September 3, 2017

This is, I think, the last feature I really miss. Like, a lot.

lthms added tag
pijul-0.8
on September 18, 2017