evaluate-dependent-jobsets: clean up test to be more clear

Dependencies

• [2] 6TCJBZ4K Use is in evaluate-dependent-jobsets
• [3] 3G475GRT Split out dependent tests in to its own .t

Change contents

• replacement in tests/evaluate-dependent-jobsets.t at line 18
  [3.393]→[3.393:513](∅→∅),[3.513]→[2.0:136](∅→∅),[2.136]→[3.651:700](∅→∅),[3.651]→[3.651:700](∅→∅),[3.700]→[2.137:250](∅→∅)
  − ok(evalSucceeds($jobset), "Evaluating jobs/build-output-as-input.nix should exit with return code 0");

  − is(nrQueuedBuildsForJobset($jobset), 1 , "Evaluating jobs/build-output-as-input.nix for first time should result in 1 build in queue");

  − for my $build (queuedBuildsForJobset($jobset)) {

  − ok(runBuild($build), "Build '".$build->job."' from jobs/build-output-as-input.nix should exit with code 0");
  [3.393]

  [3.797]
  + ok(evalSucceeds($jobset), "Evaluating jobs/build-output-as-input.nix should exit with return code 0");

  + is(nrQueuedBuildsForJobset($jobset), 1 , "Evaluation should result in 1 build in queue");

  +

  + subtest "For the 'build1' job" => sub {

  + my ($build) = queuedBuildsForJobset($jobset);

  + is($build->job, "build1", "Verify the only job we got is for 'build1'");

  +

  + ok(runBuild($build), "Build should exit with code 0");
• replacement in tests/evaluate-dependent-jobsets.t at line 27
  [3.860]→[2.251:491](∅→∅),[2.491]→[3.998:1000](∅→∅),[3.998]→[3.998:1000](∅→∅)
  − is($newbuild->finished, 1, "Build '".$build->job."' from jobs/build-output-as-input.nix should be finished.");

  − is($newbuild->buildstatus, 0, "Build '".$build->job."' from jobs/build-output-as-input.nix should have buildstatus 0.");

  − }
  [3.860]

  [3.1000]
  + is($newbuild->finished, 1, "Build should be finished.");

  + is($newbuild->buildstatus, 0, "Build should have buildstatus 0.");

  + };

  +

  + ok(evalSucceeds($jobset), "Evaluating jobs/build-output-as-input.nix for second time should exit with return code 0");

  + is(nrQueuedBuildsForJobset($jobset), 1 , "The second evaluation should result in 1 new build in queue: build2");

  + subtest "For the 'build2' job" => sub {

  + my ($build) = queuedBuildsForJobset($jobset);

  + is($build->job, "build2", "Verify the only job we got is for 'build2'");
• replacement in tests/evaluate-dependent-jobsets.t at line 37
  [3.1001]→[3.1001:1137](∅→∅),[3.1137]→[2.492:651](∅→∅),[2.651]→[3.1298:1444](∅→∅),[3.1298]→[3.1298:1444](∅→∅)
  − ok(evalSucceeds($jobset), "Evaluating jobs/build-output-as-input.nix for second time should exit with return code 0");

  − is(nrQueuedBuildsForJobset($jobset), 1 , "Evaluating jobs/build-output-as-input.nix for second time after building build1 should result in 1 build in queue");

  − for my $build (queuedBuildsForJobset($jobset)) {

  − ok(runBuild($build), "Build '".$build->job."' from jobs/basic.nix should exit with code 0");
  [3.1001]

  [3.1444]
  + ok(runBuild($build), "Build should exit with code 0");
• replacement in tests/evaluate-dependent-jobsets.t at line 39
  [3.1507]→[2.652:892](∅→∅),[2.892]→[3.1645:1647](∅→∅),[3.1645]→[3.1645:1647](∅→∅)
  − is($newbuild->finished, 1, "Build '".$build->job."' from jobs/build-output-as-input.nix should be finished.");

  − is($newbuild->buildstatus, 0, "Build '".$build->job."' from jobs/build-output-as-input.nix should have buildstatus 0.");

  − }
  [3.1507]

  [3.1647]
  + is($newbuild->finished, 1, "Build should be finished.");

  + is($newbuild->buildstatus, 0, "Build should have buildstatus 0.");

  + };