Add a Fossil vs. Git comparison

Dependencies

• [2] SQWPGFUE Finish the demos
• [3] 5LKTNB6O LOTS of progress
• [4] 4AZS4L6B Add chapters
• [5] NYFLNSVV Add some contents
• [*] ARAFRHKU Create the outline of the talk

Change contents

• edit in sections/5-fossil.md at line 142
  [3.7973261]

  [3.1721]
  +

  + ## Git vs. Fossil
• replacement in sections/5-fossil.md at line 145
  [3.1722]→[3.1722:1746](∅→∅)
  − ## Fossil for Git users
  [3.1722]

  [3.7973261]
  + <table style="font-size: 100%">

  + <thead>

  + <tr>

  + <th/>

  + <th>Git</th>

  + <th>Fossil</th>

  + </tr>

  + </thead>

  + <tbody>

  + <tr>

  + <td><strong>Sample project</strong></td>

  + <td>Linux kernel</td>

  + <td>SQLite</td>

  + </tr>

  + <tr class="fragment">

  + <td><strong>Engagement</strong></td>

  + <td>Global</td>

  + <td>Personal</td>

  + </tr>

  + <tr class="fragment">

  + <td><strong>Workflow</strong></td>

  + <td>Hierarchy</td>

  + <td>Trust</td>

  + </tr>

  + <tr class="fragment">

  + <td><strong>Contributors</strong></td>

  + <td>5,000+</td>

  + <td>4</td>

  + </tr>

  + </tbody>

  + </table>

  +

  + <https://www.fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/fossil-v-git.wiki> <!-- .element class="attribution" -->

  +

  + note:

  +

  + * Really makes you think about 'the right tool for the job'

  + * Fossil seems more suitable for small-scale, closed-source projects than Git
• replacement in sections/5-fossil.md at line 184
  [3.7973262]→[2.1054:1121](∅→∅)
  − <https://www.fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/fossil-v-git.wiki>
  [3.7973262]
  + So why are we all using Git, a version control system that was designed to support a globally-developed open-source project like the Linux kernel?

  + Are all projects like that?

  + Is your project like the Linux kernel?

  + Or does it look more like SQLite?

  + Surely something to think about.