Conjoint twin from [#701].
$ ./fork-kernels.sh + source ./functions.sh + cd .. + rm -rf pijul-tests-data + mkdir pijul-tests-data + cd pijul-tests-data + pijul init repo + cd repo + tar -xJf ../../pijul-tests/kernel/linux-2.0.1.tar.xz --strip-components=1 + stat Makefile File: Makefile Size: 9589 Blocks: 24 IO Block: 4096 regular file Device: 254,0 Inode: 133141 Links: 1 Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 1000/ mpech) Gid: ( 1001/ mpech) Access: 2022-07-25 12:45:13.086220468 +0300 Modify: 1996-06-10 08:15:28.000000000 +0300 Change: 2022-07-25 12:45:13.086220468 +0300 Birth: 2022-07-25 12:45:13.086220468 +0300 + add + pijul add -r . + record + pijul record -am. + head Makefile VERSION = 2 PATCHLEVEL = 0 SUBLEVEL = 1 ARCH = i386 # # For SMP kernels, set this. We don't want to have this in the config file # because it makes re-config very ugly and too many fundamental files depend # on "CONFIG_SMP" + pijul fork 2 + pijul channel switch 2 Outputting repository ← + tar -xJf ../../pijul-tests/kernel/linux-2.0.2.tar.xz --strip-components=1 + stat Makefile File: Makefile Size: 9589 Blocks: 24 IO Block: 4096 regular file Device: 254,0 Inode: 133141 Links: 1 Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 1000/ mpech) Gid: ( 1001/ mpech) Access: 2022-07-25 12:45:15.726309229 +0300 Modify: 1996-07-03 22:06:38.000000000 +0300 Change: 2022-07-25 12:45:15.726309229 +0300 Birth: 2022-07-25 12:45:15.726309229 +0300 + add + pijul add -r . + record + pijul record -am. Nothing to record + pijul channel switch main Outputting repository ← + head Makefile VERSION = 2 PATCHLEVEL = 0 SUBLEVEL = 2 ARCH = i386 # # For SMP kernels, set this. We don't want to have this in the config file # because it makes re-config very ugly and too many fundamental files depend # on "CONFIG_SMP" + echo OK--fork-kernels OK--fork-kernels $
I run head Makefile two times in main channel and it modified in second run. I assume both run must returns the same output.
head Makefile
+ head Makefile VERSION = 2 PATCHLEVEL = 0 SUBLEVEL = 1 ARCH = i386
SUBLEVEL must be 1.
SUBLEVEL
1
This is fixed, the last record works. It is still the same issue as #701 I believe.
Conjoint twin from [#701].