<!-- Theme used for syntax highlighting of code -->
<!-- Any section element inside of this container is displayed as a slide -->
Further reading
https://www.pexels.com/photo/white-teddy-bear-reading-book-33196/
Further reading
"Beyond Git" (by Paweł Świątkowski)
http://katafrakt.me/2017/05/27/beyond-git/
"Fossil vs. Git" (by the Fossil team)
https://www.fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/fossil-v-git.wiki
"Merging, patches and Pijul" (by Joe Neeman)
https://jneem.github.io/pijul/
Time Elapsed: 45 min.
If you want to read a bit more on the subject, here are some great articles that I read during
the preparation of this talk.
Now what?
A lot of projects are nothing like the Linux kernel. So try Fossil for a change!
Git's snapshotting might be too technical for the average user. So try Pijul for a change!
Time Elapsed: 45 min.
OK, so now what?
Well, of all the things I learned by doing research on this topic, two of them really struck me as important.
1. A lot of projects are nothing like the Linux kernel.
2. A lot of students in my "Git for developers" course are managers, test specialists, requirements engineers, Scrum Masters. And they struggle with Git's snapshot-based approach. Perhaps a patch-based approach like Pijul will suit them better.
Any questions?
https://www.pexels.com/photo/monopoly-car-piece-1634213/
Thank you! ☺️
nest.pijul.com/hannotify/will-git-be-around-forever
hanno.codes
@hannotify
hanno.embregts@infosupport.com
#FrontMania #SuccessorOfGit
@hannotify
Will Git Be Around Forever? A List of Possible Successors