# 2007 Dec 4 # # The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of # a legal notice, here is a blessing: # # May you do good and not evil. # May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others. # May you share freely, never taking more than you give. # #*********************************************************************** # # This file is to test that the issues surrounding expressions in # ORDER BY clauses on compound SELECT statements raised by ticket # #2822 have been dealt with. # # $Id: tkt2822.test,v 1.6 2008/08/20 16:35:10 drh Exp $ # set testdir [file dirname $argv0] source $testdir/tester.tcl ifcapable !compound { finish_test return } # The ORDER BY matching algorithm is three steps: # # (1) If the ORDER BY term is an integer constant i, then # sort by the i-th column of the result set. # # (2) If the ORDER BY term is an identifier (not x.y or x.y.z # but simply x) then look for a column alias with the same # name. If found, then sort by that column. # # (3) Evaluate the term as an expression and sort by the # value of the expression. # # For a compound SELECT the rules are modified slightly. # In the third rule, the expression must exactly match one # of the result columns. The sequences of three rules is # attempted first on the left-most SELECT. If that doesn't # work, we move to the right, one by one. # # Rule (3) is not in standard SQL - it is an SQLite extension, # though one copied from PostgreSQL. The rule for compound # queries where a search is made of SELECTs to the right # if the left-most SELECT does not match is not a part of # standard SQL either. This extension is unique to SQLite # as far as we know. # # Rule (2) was added by the changes ticket #2822. Prior to # that changes, SQLite did not support rule (2), making it # technically in violation of standard SQL semantics. # No body noticed because rule (3) has the same effect as # rule (2) except in some obscure cases. # # Test plan: # # tkt2822-1.* - Simple identifier as ORDER BY expression. # tkt2822-2.* - More complex ORDER BY expressions. do_test tkt2822-0.1 { execsql { CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c); CREATE TABLE t2(a, b, c); INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 3, 9); INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, 9, 27); INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(5, 15, 45); INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2, 6, 18); INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(4, 12, 36); INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(6, 18, 54); } } {} # Test the "ORDER BY <integer>" syntax. # do_test tkt2822-1.1 { execsql { SELECT a, b, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY 1; } } {1 3 9 2 6 18 3 9 27 4 12 36 5 15 45 6 18 54} do_test tkt2822-1.2 { execsql { SELECT a, CAST (b AS TEXT), c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY 2; } } {2 6 18 4 12 36 6 18 54 5 15 45 1 3 9 3 9 27} # Test the "ORDER BY <identifier>" syntax. # do_test tkt2822-2.1 { execsql { SELECT a, b, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY a; } } {1 3 9 2 6 18 3 9 27 4 12 36 5 15 45 6 18 54} do_test tkt2822-2.2 { execsql { SELECT a, CAST (b AS TEXT) AS x, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY x; } } {2 6 18 4 12 36 6 18 54 5 15 45 1 3 9 3 9 27} do_test tkt2822-2.3 { execsql { SELECT t1.a, b, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT t2.a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY a; } } {1 3 9 2 6 18 3 9 27 4 12 36 5 15 45 6 18 54} # Test the "ORDER BY <expression>" syntax. # do_test tkt2822-3.1 { execsql { SELECT a, CAST (b AS TEXT) AS x, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY CAST (b AS TEXT); } } {2 6 18 4 12 36 6 18 54 5 15 45 1 3 9 3 9 27} do_test tkt2822-3.2 { execsql { SELECT t1.a, b, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT t2.a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY t1.a; } } {1 3 9 2 6 18 3 9 27 4 12 36 5 15 45 6 18 54} # Test that if a match cannot be found in the leftmost SELECT, an # attempt is made to find a match in subsequent SELECT statements. # do_test tkt2822-3.3 { execsql { SELECT a, b, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a AS x, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY x; } } {1 3 9 2 6 18 3 9 27 4 12 36 5 15 45 6 18 54} do_test tkt2822-3.4 { # But the leftmost SELECT takes precedence. execsql { SELECT a AS b, CAST (b AS TEXT) AS a, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY a; } } {2 6 18 4 12 36 6 18 54 5 15 45 1 3 9 3 9 27} do_test tkt2822-3.5 { execsql { SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 UNION ALL SELECT a AS b, CAST (b AS TEXT) AS a, c FROM t1 ORDER BY a; } } {1 3 9 2 6 18 3 9 27 4 12 36 5 15 45 6 18 54} # Test some error conditions (ORDER BY clauses that match no column). # do_test tkt2822-4.1 { catchsql { SELECT a, b, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY x } } {1 {1st ORDER BY term does not match any column in the result set}} do_test tkt2822-4.2 { catchsql { SELECT a, CAST (b AS TEXT) AS x, c FROM t1 UNION ALL SELECT a, b, c FROM t2 ORDER BY CAST (b AS INTEGER); } } {1 {1st ORDER BY term does not match any column in the result set}} # Tests for rule (2). # # The "ORDER BY b" should match the column alias (rule 2), not the # the t3.b value (rule 3). # do_test tkt2822-5.1 { execsql { CREATE TABLE t3(a,b); INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1,8); INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(9,2); SELECT a AS b FROM t3 ORDER BY b; } } {1 9} do_test tkt2822-5.2 { # Case does not matter. b should match B execsql { SELECT a AS b FROM t3 ORDER BY B; } } {1 9} do_test tkt2822-5.3 { # Quoting should not matter execsql { SELECT a AS 'b' FROM t3 ORDER BY "B"; } } {1 9} do_test tkt2822-5.4 { # Quoting should not matter execsql { SELECT a AS "b" FROM t3 ORDER BY [B]; } } {1 9} # In "ORDER BY +b" the term is now an expression rather than # a label. It therefore matches by rule (3) instead of rule (2). # do_test tkt2822-5.5 { execsql { SELECT a AS b FROM t3 ORDER BY +b; } } {9 1} # Tests for rule 2 in compound queries # do_test tkt2822-6.1 { execsql { CREATE TABLE t6a(p,q); INSERT INTO t6a VALUES(1,8); INSERT INTO t6a VALUES(9,2); CREATE TABLE t6b(x,y); INSERT INTO t6b VALUES(1,7); INSERT INTO t6b VALUES(7,2); SELECT p, q FROM t6a UNION ALL SELECT x, y FROM t6b ORDER BY 1, 2 } } {1 7 1 8 7 2 9 2} do_test tkt2822-6.2 { execsql { SELECT p PX, q QX FROM t6a UNION ALL SELECT x XX, y YX FROM t6b ORDER BY PX, YX } } {1 7 1 8 7 2 9 2} do_test tkt2822-6.3 { execsql { SELECT p PX, q QX FROM t6a UNION ALL SELECT x XX, y YX FROM t6b ORDER BY XX, QX } } {1 7 1 8 7 2 9 2} do_test tkt2822-6.4 { execsql { SELECT p PX, q QX FROM t6a UNION ALL SELECT x XX, y YX FROM t6b ORDER BY QX, XX } } {7 2 9 2 1 7 1 8} do_test tkt2822-6.5 { execsql { SELECT p PX, q QX FROM t6a UNION ALL SELECT x XX, y YX FROM t6b ORDER BY t6b.x, QX } } {1 7 1 8 7 2 9 2} do_test tkt2822-6.6 { execsql { SELECT p PX, q QX FROM t6a UNION ALL SELECT x XX, y YX FROM t6b ORDER BY t6a.q, XX } } {7 2 9 2 1 7 1 8} # More error message tests. This is really more of a test of the # %r ordinal value formatting capablity added to sqlite3_snprintf() # by ticket #2822. # do_test tkt2822-7.1 { execsql { CREATE TABLE t7(a1,a2,a3,a4,a5,a6,a7,a8,a9,a10,a11,a12,a13,a14, a15,a16,a17,a18,a19,a20,a21,a22,a23,a24,a25); } catchsql { SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 0; } } {1 {1st ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} do_test tkt2822-7.2.1 { catchsql { SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 0; } } {1 {2nd ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} do_test tkt2822-7.2.2 { catchsql { SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 26; } } {1 {2nd ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} do_test tkt2822-7.2.3 { catchsql { SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 65536; } } {1 {2nd ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} do_test tkt2822-7.3 { catchsql { SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 0; } } {1 {3rd ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} do_test tkt2822-7.4 { catchsql { SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 0; } } {1 {4th ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} do_test tkt2822-7.9 { catchsql { SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 0; } } {1 {9th ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} do_test tkt2822-7.10 { catchsql { SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0; } } {1 {10th ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} do_test tkt2822-7.11 { catchsql { SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 0; } } {1 {11th ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} do_test tkt2822-7.12 { catchsql { SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 0; } } {1 {12th ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} do_test tkt2822-7.13 { catchsql { SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 0; } } {1 {13th ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} do_test tkt2822-7.20 { catchsql { SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19, 0 } } {1 {20th ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} do_test tkt2822-7.21 { catchsql { SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19, 20, 0 } } {1 {21st ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} do_test tkt2822-7.22 { catchsql { SELECT * FROM t7 ORDER BY 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19, 20, 21, 0 } } {1 {22nd ORDER BY term out of range - should be between 1 and 25}} finish_test