// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -fopenmp -ast-print %s | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fopenmp -x c++ -std=c++11 -emit-pch -o %t %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fopenmp -std=c++11 -include-pch %t -fsyntax-only -verify %s -ast-print | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -fopenmp-simd -ast-print %s | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fopenmp-simd -x c++ -std=c++11 -emit-pch -o %t %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fopenmp-simd -std=c++11 -include-pch %t -fsyntax-only -verify %s -ast-print | FileCheck %s
// expected-no-diagnostics
// It is unclear if we want to annotate the template instantiations, e.g., S<int>::foo, or not in the two
// situations shown below. Since it is always fair to drop assumptions, we do that for now.
;
// CHECK: template<> struct S<int> {
// CHECK: void foo() __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) {
// CHECK: void S_with_assumes_no_call() __attribute__((assume("omp_no_openmp"))) __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) {
void
// CHECK: void S_with_assumes_call() __attribute__((assume("omp_no_openmp"))) __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) {
void
// CHECK: void S_without_assumes() __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) {
void
// Same as the struct S above but the order in which we instantiate P is different, first outside of an assumes.
;
// TODO: Avoid the duplication here:
// CHECK: template<> struct P<int> {
// CHECK: void foo() __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) {
// CHECK: void P_without_assumes() __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) {
void
// CHECK: void P_with_assumes_no_call() __attribute__((assume("omp_no_openmp"))) __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) {
void
// CHECK: void P_with_assumes_call() __attribute__((assume("omp_no_openmp"))) __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) {
void