// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2a -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2a -verify -Wall -DNO_ERRORS %s
#ifndef NO_ERRORS
namespace bullet3 {
// the built-in candidates include all of the candidate operator fnuctions
// [...] that, compared to the given operator
// - do not have the same parameter-type-list as any non-member candidate
enum E { e };
// Suppress both builtin operator<=>(E, E) and operator<(E, E).
void operator<=>(E, E); // expected-note {{while rewriting}}
bool cmp = e < e; // expected-error {{invalid operands to binary expression ('void' and 'int')}}
// None of the other bullets have anything to test here. In principle we
// need to suppress both builtin operator@(A, B) and operator@(B, A) when we
// see a user-declared reversible operator@(A, B), and we do, but that's
// untestable because the only built-in reversible candidates are
// operator<=>(E, E) and operator==(E, E) for E an enumeration type, and
// those are both symmetric anyway.
}
namespace bullet4 {
// The rewritten candidate set is determined as follows:
template<int> struct X {};
X<1> x1;
X<2> x2;
struct Y {
int operator<=>(X<2>) = delete; // #1member
bool operator==(X<2>) = delete; // #2member
};
Y y;
// - For the relational operators, the rewritten candidates include all
// non-rewritten candidates for the expression x <=> y.
int operator<=>(X<1>, X<2>) = delete; // #1
// expected-note@#1 5{{candidate function has been explicitly deleted}}
// expected-note@#1 5{{candidate function (with reversed parameter order) not viable: no known conversion from 'X<1>' to 'X<2>' for 1st argument}}
bool lt = x1 < x2; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool le = x1 <= x2; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool gt = x1 > x2; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool ge = x1 >= x2; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool cmp = x1 <=> x2; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
// expected-note@#1member 5{{candidate function has been explicitly deleted}}
// expected-note@#1 5{{candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'bullet4::Y' to 'X<1>' for 1st argument}}
// expected-note@#1 5{{candidate function (with reversed parameter order) not viable: no known conversion from 'bullet4::Y' to 'X<2>' for 1st argument}}
bool mem_lt = y < x2; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool mem_le = y <= x2; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool mem_gt = y > x2; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool mem_ge = y >= x2; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool mem_cmp = y <=> x2; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
// - For the relational and three-way comparison operators, the rewritten
// candidates also include a synthesized candidate, with the order of the
// two parameters reversed, for each non-rewritten candidate for the
// expression y <=> x.
// expected-note@#1 5{{candidate function (with reversed parameter order) has been explicitly deleted}}
// expected-note@#1 5{{candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'X<2>' to 'X<1>' for 1st argument}}
bool rlt = x2 < x1; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool rle = x2 <= x1; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool rgt = x2 > x1; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool rge = x2 >= x1; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool rcmp = x2 <=> x1; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
// expected-note@#1member 5{{candidate function (with reversed parameter order) has been explicitly deleted}}
// expected-note@#1 5{{candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'X<2>' to 'X<1>' for 1st argument}}
// expected-note@#1 5{{candidate function (with reversed parameter order) not viable: no known conversion from 'bullet4::Y' to 'X<1>' for 2nd argument}}
bool mem_rlt = x2 < y; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool mem_rle = x2 <= y; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool mem_rgt = x2 > y; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool mem_rge = x2 >= y; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
bool mem_rcmp = x2 <=> y; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '<=>'}}
// For the != operator, the rewritten candidates include all non-rewritten
// candidates for the expression x == y
int operator==(X<1>, X<2>) = delete; // #2
// expected-note@#2 2{{candidate function has been explicitly deleted}}
// expected-note@#2 2{{candidate function (with reversed parameter order) not viable: no known conversion from 'X<1>' to 'X<2>' for 1st argument}}
bool eq = x1 == x2; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '=='}}
bool ne = x1 != x2; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '=='}}
// expected-note@#2member 2{{candidate function has been explicitly deleted}}
// expected-note@#2 2{{candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'bullet4::Y' to 'X<1>' for 1st argument}}
// expected-note@#2 2{{candidate function (with reversed parameter order) not viable: no known conversion from 'bullet4::Y' to 'X<2>' for 1st argument}}
bool mem_eq = y == x2; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '=='}}
bool mem_ne = y != x2; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '=='}}
// For the equality operators, the rewritten candidates also include a
// synthesized candidate, with the order of the two parameters reversed, for
// each non-rewritten candidate for the expression y == x
// expected-note@#2 2{{candidate function (with reversed parameter order) has been explicitly deleted}}
// expected-note@#2 2{{candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'X<2>' to 'X<1>' for 1st argument}}
bool req = x2 == x1; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '=='}}
bool rne = x2 != x1; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '=='}}
// expected-note@#2member 2{{candidate function (with reversed parameter order) has been explicitly deleted}}
// expected-note@#2 2{{candidate function not viable: no known conversion from 'X<2>' to 'X<1>' for 1st argument}}
// expected-note@#2 2{{candidate function (with reversed parameter order) not viable: no known conversion from 'bullet4::Y' to 'X<1>' for 2nd argument}}
bool mem_req = x2 == y; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '=='}}
bool mem_rne = x2 != y; // expected-error {{selected deleted operator '=='}}
// For all other operators, the rewritten candidate set is empty.
X<3> operator+(X<1>, X<2>) = delete; // expected-note {{no known conversion from 'X<2>' to 'X<1>'}}
X<3> reversed_add = x2 + x1; // expected-error {{invalid operands}}
}
namespace PR44627 {
namespace ADL {
struct type {};
bool operator==(type lhs, int rhs) {
return true;
}
}
bool b1 = ADL::type() == 0;
bool b2 = 0 == ADL::type();
}
// Various C++17 cases that are known to be broken by the C++20 rules.
namespace problem_cases {
// We can have an ambiguity between an operator and its reversed form. This
// wasn't intended by the original "consistent comparison" proposal, and we
// allow it as extension, picking the non-reversed form.
struct A {
bool operator==(const A&); // expected-note {{ambiguity is between a regular call to this operator and a call with the argument order reversed}}
};
bool cmp_non_const = A() == A(); // expected-warning {{ambiguous}}
struct B {
virtual bool operator==(const B&) const;
};
struct D : B {
bool operator==(const B&) const override; // expected-note {{operator}}
};
bool cmp_base_derived = D() == D(); // expected-warning {{ambiguous}}
template<typename T> struct CRTPBase {
bool operator==(const T&) const; // expected-note {{operator}} expected-note {{reversed}}
bool operator!=(const T&) const; // expected-note {{non-reversed}}
};
struct CRTP : CRTPBase<CRTP> {};
bool cmp_crtp = CRTP() == CRTP(); // expected-warning-re {{ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function{{$}}}}}}
bool cmp_crtp2 = CRTP() != CRTP(); // expected-warning {{ambiguous despite there being a unique best viable function with non-reversed arguments}}
// Given a choice between a rewritten and non-rewritten function with the
// same parameter types, where the rewritten function is reversed and each
// has a better conversion for one of the two arguments, prefer the
// non-rewritten one.
using UBool = signed char; // ICU uses this.
struct ICUBase {
virtual UBool operator==(const ICUBase&) const;
UBool operator!=(const ICUBase &arg) const { return !operator==(arg); }
};
struct ICUDerived : ICUBase {
UBool operator==(const ICUBase&) const override; // expected-note {{declared here}} expected-note {{ambiguity is between}}
};
bool cmp_icu = ICUDerived() != ICUDerived(); // expected-warning {{ambiguous}} expected-warning {{'bool', not 'problem_cases::UBool'}}
}
#else // NO_ERRORS
namespace problem_cases {
// We can select a reversed candidate where we used to select a non-reversed
// one, and in the worst case this can dramatically change the meaning of the
// program. Make sure we at least warn on the worst cases under -Wall.
struct iterator;
struct const_iterator {
const_iterator(iterator);
bool operator==(const const_iterator&) const;
};
struct iterator {
bool operator==(const const_iterator &o) const { // expected-warning {{all paths through this function will call itself}}
return o == *this;
}
};
}
#endif // NO_ERRORS