; Test for PR45393: Two virtual functions that return unique i1 values ; in the same vtable. Both calls are optimized to a comparison of ; this's vptr against the address of the vtable. When nesting these ; checks, LLVM would previously assume the nested check always fails, ; but that assumption does not hold if both checks refer to the same vtable. ; This tests checks that this case is handled correctly. ; ; RUN: opt -S -passes='wholeprogramdevirt,default<O2>' -wholeprogramdevirt-summary-action=import \ ; RUN: -wholeprogramdevirt-read-summary=%p/Inputs/unique-retval-same-vtable.yaml \ ; RUN: -o - %s | FileCheck %s ; ; Check that C::f() contains both possible return values. ; CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_ZNK1C1fEv ; CHECK-NOT: } ; CHECK: 20074028 ; CHECK-NOT: } ; CHECK: 1008434 target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" %class.C = type { i32 (...)** } define hidden i32 @_ZNK1C1fEv(%class.C* %this) { entry: %0 = bitcast %class.C* %this to i1 (%class.C*)*** %vtable = load i1 (%class.C*)**, i1 (%class.C*)*** %0 %1 = bitcast i1 (%class.C*)** %vtable to i8* %2 = tail call i1 @llvm.type.test(i8* %1, metadata !"_ZTS1C") tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 %2) %vfn = getelementptr inbounds i1 (%class.C*)*, i1 (%class.C*)** %vtable, i64 2 %3 = load i1 (%class.C*)*, i1 (%class.C*)** %vfn %call = tail call zeroext i1 %3(%class.C* %this) br i1 %call, label %if.then, label %return if.then: %vtable2 = load i1 (%class.C*)**, i1 (%class.C*)*** %0 %4 = bitcast i1 (%class.C*)** %vtable2 to i8* %5 = tail call i1 @llvm.type.test(i8* %4, metadata !"_ZTS1C") tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 %5) %vfn3 = getelementptr inbounds i1 (%class.C*)*, i1 (%class.C*)** %vtable2, i64 3 %6 = load i1 (%class.C*)*, i1 (%class.C*)** %vfn3 ; The method being called here and the method being called before ; the branch above both return true in the same vtable and only that ; vtable. Therefore, if this call is reached, we must select ; 20074028. Earlier versions of LLVM mistakenly concluded that ; this code *never* selects 200744028. %call4 = tail call zeroext i1 %6(%class.C* nonnull %this) %. = select i1 %call4, i32 20074028, i32 3007762 br label %return return: %retval.0 = phi i32 [ %., %if.then ], [ 1008434, %entry ] ret i32 %retval.0 } declare i1 @llvm.type.test(i8*, metadata) declare void @llvm.assume(i1)