From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Mon Oct 7 20:37:15 2002
Return-Path: <spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A0116F16
for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:37:14 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 07 Oct 2002 20:37:14 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
[216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
g97JJVK13715 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:19:32 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17ydPJ-0000uV-00; Mon,
07 Oct 2002 12:19:09 -0700
Received: from relay05.indigo.ie ([194.125.133.229]) by
usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
17ydOd-0007iV-00 for <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 07 Oct 2002 12:18:27 -0700
Received: (qmail 79119 messnum 1202246 invoked from
network[194.125.172.237/ts12-237.dublin.indigo.ie]); 7 Oct 2002 19:18:21
-0000
Received: from ts12-237.dublin.indigo.ie (HELO spamassassin.taint.org)
(194.125.172.237) by relay05.indigo.ie (qp 79119) with SMTP;
7 Oct 2002 19:18:21 -0000
Received: by spamassassin.taint.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 18C6916F03;
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:18:20 +0100 (IST)
Received: from spamassassin.taint.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamassassin.taint.org (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 152DCF7B1; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 20:18:20 +0100 (IST)
To: "Kenneth Nerhood" <knerhood@wrallp.com>
Cc: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Re: AWL bug in 2.42?
In-Reply-To: Message from
"Kenneth Nerhood"
<knerhood@wrallp.com> of
"Mon, 07 Oct 2002 14:54:11 EDT."
<sda1a029.029@mail.wrallp.com>
From: yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org (Justin Mason)
X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: 0A48 2D8B 0B52 A87D 0E8A 6ADD 4137 1B50 6E58 EF0A
X-Habeas-Swe-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-Swe-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-Swe-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-Swe-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-Swe-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-Swe-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-Swe-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
Message-Id: <20021007191820.18C6916F03@spamassassin.taint.org>
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
<mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchives/forum.php?forum=spamassassin-talk>
X-Original-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 20:18:15 +0100
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 20:18:15 +0100
Kenneth Nerhood said:
> I too am seeing very weird things with 2.42 and AWL. I installed a
> fresh system, and then ran a bunch of test spam through it (all from the
> same user). All messages should have scored over 15. The AWL kept
> adjusting them down so that after about 10 message I had a negative
> score. I'm using spamc/d.
That's exactly what is intended; the idea is that legit senders who
habitually score just > 5, will eventually get out of "AWL hell" after
6-10 messages.
Note that running a single spam through "spamassassin -a -t" *will*
eventually whitelist the spammer. but that's why the man page tells you
not to do it ;)
--j.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk