From fork-admin@xent.com Sat Sep 7 21:53:06 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E2716F1E
for <jm@localhost>; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 21:52:29 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 07 Sep 2002 21:52:29 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g872ONC03451 for <jm@jmason.org>;
Sat, 7 Sep 2002 03:24:23 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 46EAD2940E5; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 19:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net (isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net
[64.243.46.20]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DDBAB2940D8 for
<fork@xent.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 19:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 22857 invoked by uid 501); 7 Sep 2002 02:21:09 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP;
7 Sep 2002 02:21:09 -0000
From: CDale <cdale@techmonkeys.net>
To: Geege Schuman <geege@barrera.org>
Cc: bitbitch@magnesium.net, "Adam L. Beberg" <beberg@mithral.com>,
<fork@xent.com>
Subject: RE: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
In-Reply-To: <ILEHJNJFPDLMDEKNIAKCEEDACAAA.geege@barrera.org>
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209062120580.13901-100000@isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 21:21:09 -0500 (CDT)
Why should I? (:
C
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Geege Schuman wrote:
> quitcherbraggin.
>
> :-)
> gg
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fork-admin@xent.com [mailto:fork-admin@xent.com]On Behalf Of CDale
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:42 AM
> To: bitbitch@magnesium.net
> Cc: Adam L. Beberg; fork@spamassassin.taint.org
> Subject: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
>
>
> I dunno, BB. Women who like to be thought of this way should have the
> right to choose to be treated this way. Men too... ahem. (: My boy
> cleans, washes clothes, cooks, fixes stuff, etc, and works the same number
> of hours I do, sometimes more, if he has to catch up with me. (: I
> close him because he is industrious and creative, and because he
> unfailingly makes my bed the minute I get out of it. And boy #2 will be
> here soon to help boy #1 with other things such as pedicures, backrubs,
> and sure, fucking. LOL! (along with the aforementioned "chores") Adam can
> have his cake and eat it too, if he can only find the right girl who has
> the same beliefs about gender roles that he has. Of course, he has NO
> clue where to look, so we will be constantly laughing at him while he
> stumbles around in the dark.
> Cindy
> P.S. the numbers do not in any way indicate importance or favor -- only
> the order in which they move into my house. -smiles at chris-
> P.S. #2. I'm moving. Going to New Orleans. Can't handle any more cab
> driving. The summer sucked here on the MS Gulf Coast, instead of rocking
> like it normally does. Wish me luck. I'm going to look for another
> computer job. Le Sigh. (:
>
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 bitbitch@magnesium.net wrote:
>
> > Hello Adam,
> >
> > Thursday, September 05, 2002, 11:33:18 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >
> > ALB> So, you're saying that product bundling works? Good point.
> >
> > Sometimes I wish I was still in CA. You deserve a good beating every
> > so often... (anyone else want to do the honors?)
> >
> > ALB> And how is this any different from "normal" marriage exactly? Other
> then
> > ALB> that the woman not only gets a man, but one in a country where both
> she and
> > ALB> her offspring will have actual opportunities? Oh and the lack of
> > ALB> "de-feminized, over-sized, self-centered, mercenary-minded" choices?
> >
> > Mmkay. For the nth time Adam, we don't live in the land of
> > Adam-fantasy. Women actually are allowed to do things productive,
> > independent and entirely free of their male counterparts. They aren't
> > forced to cook and clean and merely be sexual vessels. Sometimes,
> > and this will come as a shock to you, no doubt, men and women even
> > find -love- (which is the crucial distinction between this system) and
> > they marry one another for the satisfaction of being together. I
> > know, far-fetched and idealistically crazy as it is, but such things
> > do happen. I can guarantee you, if my mother was approached by my
> > father, and 25 years ago, he commented on her cleaning ability as a
> > motivator for marrying her, we would not be having this conversation
> > now.
> >
> > If guys still have silly antequated ideas about 'women's role' then
> > their opportunities for finding women _will_ be scarce. Again, these
> > situations are great, provided everyone is aware that the relationship
> > is a contractual one -- he wants a maid, a dog and a prostitute he
> > doesn't have to pay, and she wants a country that isn't impoverished
> > and teeming with AIDS. A contract, versus a true love-interest
> > marriage.
> >
> > Egh. I really need to stop analyzing your posts to this extent. I
> > blame law school and my cat.
> >
> > -BB
> >
> > ALB> - Adam L. "Duncan" Beberg
> > ALB> http://www.mithral.com/~beberg/
> > ALB> beberg@mithral.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> "I don't take no stocks in mathematics, anyway" --Huckleberry Finn
>
>
>
>
>
--
"I don't take no stocks in mathematics, anyway" --Huckleberry Finn