From spamassassin-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Mon Sep 16 00:10:47 2002
Return-Path: <spamassassin-devel-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C2C16F03
for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 00:10:47 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 16 Sep 2002 00:10:47 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
[216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
g8FKfDC27929 for <jm@jmason.org>; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 21:41:13 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17qgBZ-0006Tv-00; Sun,
15 Sep 2002 13:40:05 -0700
Received: from www.ctyme.com ([209.237.228.10] helo=darwin.ctyme.com) by
usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17qgBK-0003IH-00 for
<spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:39:50
-0700
Received: from m206-56.dsl.tsoft.com ([198.144.206.56] helo=perkel.com) by
darwin.ctyme.com with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17qgB6-0002Od-00;
Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:39:36 -0700
Message-Id: <3D84F004.7000805@perkel.com>
From: Marc Perkel <marc@perkel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020513
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Tony L. Svanstrom" <tony@svanstrom.com>
Cc: spamassassin-devel@example.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [SAdev] Suggestion - 2 levels of Spam Status
References: <20020915223031.O43994-100000@moon.campus.luth.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: spamassassin-devel-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: spamassassin-devel-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-devel@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-devel-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-devel@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel>,
<mailto:spamassassin-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: SpamAssassin Developers <spamassassin-devel.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel>,
<mailto:spamassassin-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=spamassassin-devel>
X-Original-Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:39:32 -0700
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 13:39:32 -0700
Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
>On Sun, 15 Sep 2002 the voices made Marc Perkel write:
>
>>Right now we have one spam status flag indicating that a message is or
>>is not spam. The idea being that the end user perhaps make a rule that
>>would move the spam flagged messages into a spam folder and thus gain
>>some time by presorting messages into to piles.
>>
>
> If you (people) don't know enough to filter on the actual score they've got
>the "stars", which will give them more than enough levers, if they want it.
>
>
> /Tony
>
Sure - we developers know that - but what I'm talking about is making it
easier for END USERS to figure out.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-devel mailing list
Spamassassin-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-devel