From fork-admin@xent.com Mon Sep 9 19:27:46 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1159116F03
for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 19:27:46 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:27:46 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g89FIvC20754 for <jm@jmason.org>;
Mon, 9 Sep 2002 16:19:01 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 168242940E2; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from relay.pair.com (relay1.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by xent.com
(Postfix) with SMTP id 762402940C9 for <fork@xent.com>; Mon,
9 Sep 2002 08:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 86095 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2002 15:16:59 -0000
Received: from adsl-63-196-1-228.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO golden)
(63.196.1.228) by relay1.pair.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2002 15:16:59 -0000
X-Pair-Authenticated: 63.196.1.228
Message-Id: <00e701c25813$eec5ab70$640a000a@golden>
From: "Gordon Mohr" <gojomo@usa.net>
To: <fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209091553450.32400-100000@hydrogen.leitl.org>
<15773384464.20020909103246@magnesium.net>
Subject: Re: Re[3]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:16:53 -0700
Bitbitch writes:
> Listen. If you pull numbers like that without a fact, the automagic
> assumption is yes, they were extracted out of your neither orifice.
> Point wasn't to conclude otherwise unless you had any relevant bits.
> Its not my job to do _your_ bit searching for you, but I figured I'd
> humor fork with this bit of finding:
>
> http://www.thebody.com/bp/apr01/research_notebook.html (Pointing ot
> averages of about 13 for every 3 months (for gay men), which totals to
> about 52 a year. 52 a year doesn't equal 3000. Or even 300.
Er, that study would seem to lend credence to Eugen's
estimations, rather than casting fresh doubts.
52 a year *does* exceed 300, in under 6 years' time. The average
age of that study's participants was *39* -- meaning some
participants may have had 20-25+ years of active sex life.
At that age, and further ** HIV+ **, it seems reasonable to
think that some the participants may have actually slowed
their pace a bit.
So while this study's summary info is incomplete, you could
easily conclude that the *average* participant in this one study
will have had over a thousand partners over a 40-50+ year active
sex life, and so the even-more-active tails of the distribution
could easily be in the 3000+ range.
Of course this says very little, almost nothing, about the overall
population behavior, gay or straight, and the relative prevalence
of 3K+ individuals in either group. But it does strongly suggest
that gay males with 3K+ partners exist in measurable numbers, so
people should stop treating Eugen's anecdotal estimation as if it
were sheer fantasy. BitBitch's own citation suggests otherwise.
- Gordon