From fork-admin@xent.com Wed Sep 18 17:43:31 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1544E16F03
for <jm@localhost>; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:43:30 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 18 Sep 2002 17:43:30 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8IFmlC05232 for <jm@jmason.org>;
Wed, 18 Sep 2002 16:48:48 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 579FF2940C5; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 08:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88])
by xent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92CFB29409E for <fork@xent.com>;
Wed, 18 Sep 2002 08:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Intellistation ([66.31.2.27]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id
<20020918154734.SMXN6128.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@Intellistation> for
<fork@xent.com>; Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:47:34 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Eirikur Hallgrimsson <eh@mad.scientist.com>
Organization: Electric Brain
To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Subject: Re: [VoID] a new low on the personals tip...
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1
References: <20020918104740.5A00BC44D@argote.ch>
In-Reply-To: <20020918104740.5A00BC44D@argote.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <200209181145.50631.eh@mad.scientist.com>
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 11:45:50 -0400
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 06:47 am, Robert Harley wrote:
> ....and with the crucial hair feature enabled!
That got a good laugh out of me. Just saying "crucial hair feature"
improves my day immeasurably.
I've done a fair amount of thinking about the "media intermediated" meeting
thing. It seriously loses for reasons like Rohit's just encountered.
One is both rejected for trivial reasons and rejects for the same.
Some people loudly defend that these choices are not trivial.
I'd have never met my best friend if I had to pick her out of a crowd for
getting to know. I was a teen at the time, but I won't say I'm much
improved at being able to spot "interesting" at a distance. Interesting
isn't an external thing. I have that brought home to me again every so
often. I may think that interesting people dress differently or whatever,
but that's total superstition. How do I know what your version of
creative attire is? Maybe it's purely functional.
I was at a loud party recently, sufficiently loud that conversation of any
kind was extremely difficult, and intoxication was the norm. I was
working on what my algorithm for meeting people there should be and one of
the candidates was "women, in order of attractiveness." I flinched from
that, rather violently. At a trade show, or something, I might elect to
talk to the people who are looking at interesting exhibits. At a
party.....well, if you can't hear the conversation they are having, or if
on the net all you have is a photo.....
You just can't tell important things from a picture and a few words. It's
not how we are built. There's no geek code for the heart and soul.
(And if there were people would lie and game the system.)
It's too easy to say "Oh, no! He's a geek!" or "She's a CAT person,
ick!" when you might have a great time together.
We are constructed to form alliances based on how we fit together as
people, how we feel in the other person's company, how well we partner on
tasks and recreation. This is all entirely speculative based on nothing
but superstitious association unless you actually have time in the
person's company. Which is why we tend to be screwed when our circle of
exposure shrinks after school.
Personally, as a writer, the whole internet meet & email thing ought to
work better for me than it does for other people, but interestingly, it
doesn't. I have to put out the same amount of effort and reap about the
same poor results. I have to think it's not the people, but the tool.
An aside (okay, yes, I'm a tool geek): Speed Dating
Speed Dating (aka 7 Minute Dating) is a live-action stab at actual time in
the company of a variety of people, compressed into one event. I think
it's noticably better, but still absolutely nothing like working on a
project together, cooking, climbing a mountain or whatever.
It was, in fact, invented as a jewish thing seeking to match up the young
people to avoid total assimilation. It has too much "interview" context
and no shared activity beyond that. I give it several points for effort
though.
I guess my impression that even the Speed Dating thing doesn't do much for
you means that the traditional advice of "join activities groups" is
actually sound.
Eirikur