From fork-admin@xent.com Fri Sep 6 11:42:43 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1CA16F6E
for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:40:00 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 06 Sep 2002 11:40:00 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
(8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g86A2wC30579 for <jm@jmason.org>;
Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:02:58 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 47990294295; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 03:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net (isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net
[64.243.46.20]) by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 95CCF294294 for
<fork@xent.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2002 02:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30958 invoked by uid 501); 6 Sep 2002 10:01:51 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP;
6 Sep 2002 10:01:51 -0000
From: CDale <cdale@techmonkeys.net>
To: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
Cc: bitbitch@magnesium.net, "Adam L. Beberg" <beberg@mithral.com>,
<fork@xent.com>
Subject: Re[2]: Selling Wedded Bliss (was Re: Ouch...)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209061122540.30472-100000@hydrogen.leitl.org>
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209060454450.13901-100000@isolnetsux.techmonkeys.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
<mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 05:01:51 -0500 (CDT)
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 bitbitch@magnesium.net wrote:
>
> > If guys still have silly antequated ideas about 'women's role' then
> > their opportunities for finding women _will_ be scarce.
>
> What is silly and antiquated depends a lot on which country you live in.
It also depends on what the fad is or what is in style. (:
> I don't have statistics on the love half life, but it seems long-term
> relationships use something else for glue.
>
> Clearly our non-silly non-antiquated ideas about relationships have
> resulted in mostly short-duration relationships and single-parented,
> dysfunctional kids (not enough of them too boot, so to keep our
> demographics from completely keeling over we're importing them from places
> with mostly silly and antiquated ideas).
Actualy our silly antiquated ideas about relationships and love have
resulted in the bleedings of many upon many a page (and musical instrumnet,
and canvas) What's the problem if we dash a little Mrs. Dash on them? (:
Or cayenne. Or ginger. (mm ask me about ginger root play).
And let me tell you this: just because a child happens to be
single-parented (what a word), does not mean that child is dysfunctional
or lives in a dysfunctional home. The govt/media/church has tried to make
it look like there is a disintegration, when in fact, there is a coming
together of other family members and friends to raise children. It's not
decaying -- it's changing. Nothing wrong with change.
> At least from the viewpoint of demographics sustainability and
> counterpressure to gerontocracy and resulting innovatiophobia we're doing
> something wrong.
>
> Maybe we should really go dirty Tleilaxu all the way.
>
Maybe y'all should buy m-w some more bandwidth.
C
--
"I don't take no stocks in mathematics, anyway" --Huckleberry Finn